Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Filmmaking books `

  1. #1
    Inactive Member Chance1234's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 4th, 2000
    Posts
    1,698
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    just diggin out a old link, but

    http://5ylac.s5.com/FilmMakingBook.html

  2. #2
    Inactive Member twister!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    June 24th, 2001
    Posts
    1,034
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Yep, that Katz book is good.

    Another I'd recommend is David Mamet's 'On DIrecting Film' - this is very concise and easy to read. He mainly explains and demonstrates the montage theory, also as you'd expect from Mamet, some good bits on acting and performance.

    On ediiting a great little book is Walter Murch's 'In the blink of an eye'

    One that has just come out and I'm reading it at the moment which is BRILLIANT is Alexander Mackendrick's 'On Film-making: An introduction to the craft of the director' - Mackendrick was a director (Ladykillers, man in the white suit, Sweet smell of success) who decided directing had become to much about 'deal-making' so quit fairly young in order to pursue a career teaching film-making at Cal-Arts. The book is very in-depth about all aspects of the process from dramatic construction, character, POV, condensing screen time, subtext, working with actors, getting performances etc etc. It really is SUPERB and the best I've read by quite some way!

  3. #3
    Inactive Member Spunkey1pestic's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 1st, 2004
    Posts
    166
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    American Cinematographer Manual

    This is the filmaker's bible! [img]cool.gif[/img]

  4. #4
    Inactive Member eidde's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 21st, 2003
    Posts
    362
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

  5. #5
    Inactive Member Nigel's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 31st, 2000
    Posts
    1,668
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    The ASC book really only has DOF charts...A kelly wheel is better for those anyway.

    If I see a kid on a set with an ASC book I know that they are either A) In film school B) Don't know any better

    Good Luck

  6. #6
    Inactive Member peter_g's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 23rd, 2003
    Posts
    253
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    I don't like a Kelly wheel or charts. Instead I use a palm pilot. I have a piece of software that calculates depth of field perfectly and is not at all cumbersome. The best film making books, from a European perspective at least is the guerrilla film makers hand book series. They are packed with practical, current advice. I'd recommend them to anyone.

  7. #7
    Inactive Member Nigel's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 31st, 2000
    Posts
    1,668
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    The problem with a Palm-Pilot is that it's electronic...When you are in the middle of nowhere a Kelly-Wheel will always work.

    Yes, there are all sorts of little things you can download for a lap-top or Palm using BlueTooth this or wireless that. Yet, they never seem to save anytime and when it is crunch time the batteries are dead.

    Good Luck

  8. #8
    Inactive Member peter_g's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 23rd, 2003
    Posts
    253
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    When you enter the lens, subject distance and f stop into that palm pilot software, it applies all this into some kind of mathematical formula from which it derives a depth of field. On the other hand with charts or a Kelly wheel there is often a certain amount of guestimation going on. What if one uses an irregular lens (e.g. 23mm)? The depth of field will be slightly different to that of a 25mm lens. Yet, if you use a Kelly wheel or depth of field charts you will just work off the figures for a 25mm lens. I prefer to have the exact right figures. It won't matter most of the time, but I like to maximise my margin of error whenever possible. Naturally I have a Kelly wheel standing by in case my palm pilot batteries die.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •